• Pulse Asia
  • Approval Rules
  • Family Planning
  • Presidential...

Overwhelming majority of Filipinos (92%) believe it is important to mitigate fertility and plan their family

Filipinos do not only recognize the importance of family planning, they also strongly approve of government’s allocation of funds for modern contraceptives. The latest Pulse Asia Survey concluded just before the 2007 elections showed an overwhelming majority of Filipinos (92%) believe it is important to mitigate fertility and plan their family. ...

A fourth committee of the House of Representatives has endorsed H.B. 5043

A fourth committee of the House of Representatives has endorsed House Bill 5043 or the proposed “Reproductive Health, Responsible Parenthood and Population Development Act of 2008” principally authored by Albay Rep. Edcel C. Lagman. The Committee on Rules approved today the plenary consideration of the controversial bill which mandates government to provide information and services on all forms of family planning and allocate adequate funds for the reproductive health program. ...

Family Planning

“It is distressing that the miracle of life means death to 10 mothers daily in the Philippines,” Rep. Edcel C. Lagman of Albay stressed during the 2nd National Multi-Sectoral Conference on Population and Development last August 15, 2007. The Bicol solon is the principal author of House Bill No. 17 or the “Reproductive Health, Responsible Parenthood and Population Development Act of 2007”. ...

Presidential Approval of 2008 GAA Affirms Executive-Legislative Common Agenda

The Presidential approval of the P1.227 trillion 2008 General Appropriations Act with minimal direct item vetoes is a reaffirmation of the Executive-Legislative common agenda of providing adequate basic social services and enhancing infrastructure development. It also signifies the Executive’s guarded concurrence with the congressional thrusts on non-confrontational debt service reduction policy and accelerated impartial stress on reproductive health and population management. ...
New and old acceptable amendments do not dilute or destroy the essence of the original rh bill Print
Press Statements
Thursday, 18 October 2012 11:17
Rep. Edcel C. Lagman
Independent – Albay
17 October 2012
0916-6406737 / 0918-9120137


           In addition to the acceptable amendments which were previously announced by the co-authors of the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Bill (House Bill No. 4244) to address the objections, reservations and concerns of oppositors, the following new amendments are likewise acceptable as a result of the latest round of consultations:


           1. The State guarantees public access to and relevant information and education on medically safe, legal, ethical, affordable, effective and   quality reproductive health care services, methods, devices and supplies which do not prevent implantation of a fertilized ovum as determined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).


           2. The State shall likewise prioritize the needs of poor women and men in marginalized households as identified by the National Household Targeting System for Poverty Reduction (NHTS-PR) and other government measures of identifying marginalization, who shall be voluntary beneficiaries of reproductive health care, services and supplies for free.


           3. The State shall also provide funding support to promote modern-natural methods of family planning consistent with the needs of acceptors.


           4. The State shall promote openness to life, provided that parents bring forth to the world only those children that they can raise in a truly humane way.


           5. There shall be no demographic and population targets and the mitigation, promotion and/or stabilization of the population growth rate are incidental to the advancement of reproductive health and sustainable human development.


           6. Family planning information and services shall include as a first priority making women of reproductive age fully aware of their respective fertility cycles.


           7. The teaching of reproductive health and sexuality education shall be promoted and conducted with due deference to cultural, religious and ethical norms of various communities.


           8. Flexibility in the teaching of reproductive health and sexuality education shall be accorded to sectarian schools within the provisions and parameters of the Section on age-appropriate mandatory reproductive health and sexuality education.


           9. The FDA shall update the Philippine National Drug Formulary (PNDF) with respect to modern family planning products and supplies in accordance with standard medical practice.


         The foregoing amendments are contained in the proposed substitute bill which was announced by Majority Leader Neptali Gonzales, Jr. in the plenary and distributed to all Members of the House.


         It will be recalled that the following amendments were previously announced as acceptable:


         1. Deletion of the provision on “Ideal Family Size” to assure critics that the bill does not impose a “two-child policy” like China’s “one-child  policy”. The original version merely contemplates an ideal norm which is neither mandatory, compulsory nor punitive.


         2. Deletion of the section on “Employer’s Responsibilities” to address concerns that a similar provision in Article 134 of the Labor Code is already adequate.


         3. Deletion of the section on “Family Planning Supplies as Essential Medicines” to accommodate objections that such a prior classification cannot be made by law. In lieu of the protested provision, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is charged with the determination of the safety, efficacy and classification of modern family planning products and supplies pursuant to existing law.


         4. Deletion of the prohibited act on malicious disinformation in order to fully guarantee the freedom of speech and the freedom of religion.


         5. Assurance of funding support to promote modern natural methods of family planning like the Billings, Sympto-Thermal and Standard Days methods.


      6. Hospitals owned and operated by a religious group are given the option not to provide “a full range of modern family planning methods” in order to further guarantee religious freedom.


         7. Imposition of penalties to pharmaceutical companies, whether domestic or multi-national, which collude with government officials and employees in the purchase, procurement and distribution of modern family planning supplies, products and devices, and/or contribute to partisan political activities, in order to disabuse the minds of critics that there is a pharmaceutical lobby for the enactment of the RH bill.


         8. Deletion of the provision making the congressional Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) as the mandatory source for the acquisition and operation of the Mobile Health Care Service vehicles to respect the differing views of Congresspersons.


         9. Emphasis that the bill is not a population control measure.


       10. Parents are given the option not to allow their minor children to attend reproductive health and sexuality education classes to accord respect to religious convictions and beliefs.


        The foregoing new and old acceptable amendments do not dilute or destroy the essence of the original bill even as they accommodate the suggestions and concerns of well-meaning oppositors.

Anti-Enforced Disappearance Bill ratified after 2 decades Print
Press Statements
Thursday, 18 October 2012 11:30


  • Rep. Edcel C. Lagman
  • Independent – Albay
  • 16 October 2012
  • 0916-6406737 / 0918-9120137


            The occurrence of enforced or involuntary disappearance and the impunity of offenders who are agents of the State may now be finally consigned to the past with the congressional approval of the bicameral conference report today of the “Anti-Enforced or Involuntary Disappearance Act of 2012” which imposes stern deterrents against its commission.

             Enforced disappearance was an atrocious tool of the martial law regime to silence protesters and human rights advocates and continues to be employed by subsequent administrations after the end of the martial law regime.

              The expected signing of the enrolled bill into law by President Benigno Aquino will be a milestone in Asia as it will be the first national law to criminalize enforced disappearance as a separate or distinct offense.

             The enactment of the measure, which was principally authored by Rep. Edcel C. Lagman of Albay in the House of Representatives, is a culmination of more than 20 years of militant advocacy for the desaparecidos.

             The other salient features of the measure are the following:

  1. The crime of enforced disappearance is generally imprescriptible as an exception to the statute of limitations.
  1. No amnesty can exempt any offender, either convicted or facing prosecution, from liability.
  1. No war or any public emergency can justify the suspension of the enforcement of the anti-disappearance law.
  1. Command responsibility makes a superior officer also culpable for violations of the law by subordinates.
  1. Subordinates are authorized to defy unlawful orders of superiors for the commission of enforced disappearance.
  1. A periodically updated registry of all detained persons is required in all detention centers.
  1. Secret detention facilities are prohibited.
  1. Compensation, restitution and rehabilitation of victims and kin are mandated.
  1. Gradation of penalties are prescribed with reclusion perpetua as the severest penalty.
  1. Human Rights organizations shall participate in the crafting of the necessary Implementing Rules and Regulations.
Sounding Board Print
In the News
Monday, 10 September 2012 17:41



  • Conversing with a Bishop
  • By: Fr. Joaquin G. Bernas S.J.
  • Philippine Daily Inquirer


<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>